ARGUMENTASI ILMIAH DAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MELALUI METODE DEBAT

SURAYA, SURAYA and SETIADI, ANANDITA EKA and MULDAYANTI, NURI DEWI (2019) ARGUMENTASI ILMIAH DAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MELALUI METODE DEBAT. EDUSAINS, 11 (2). pp. 233-241. ISSN 1979-7281

Preview

Text 8 ARGUMENTASI ILMIAH DAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MELALUI METODE DEBAT.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Lack of self-confidence and weak student reasoning in biology learning are related to scientific argumentation skills and critical thinking skills. This study aims to examine scientific argumentation and critical thinking skills of class X students in MAN 1 Natuna through debate methods on biodiversity material. This study uses a qualitative approach with descriptive methods. Data collection using observation, interviews, and documentation. Assessment of scientific argumentation and critical thinking was done oral and written. Scientific argumentation skills refer to Toulmin's Argument Pattern (TAP) and critical thinking skills are categorized in Strong, Acceptable, Unacceptable, & Weak. The results showed that student' scientific argumentation skills were at levels 2, 3, and 4. None of the students were at levels 1 and 5. Students' critical thinking skills were in the Unacceptable (62.06%) and Acceptable (37.94% ) category. Scientific arguments and critical thinking of class X students at MAN 1 Natuna are low.

Actions (login required)

View Item